Engadget42%

DuckDuckGo Browser can now block video ads, including YouTube's 11%

By Anna Washenko55%

7/8/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Burden of Proof, and Indoctrination, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 177 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,610 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the article peer group.

DuckDuckGo announced that it can now block most video ads, particularly those on YouTube, when a video is playing in its browser. 
In a blog post about the new feature, the company explained that its YouTube ad detection and blocking is based on the open-source community filter lists from uBlockOrigin. 
DuckDuckGo noted that it may also apply its own rules for better compatibility, but viewers may see longer buffering times when using the blocker and there may still be some unexpected hiccups. 
The blocking feature will be on by default for most DuckDuckGo users on iPhone, Windows and Mac. 
It will be automatically enabled soon on Android but can be manually activated in the browser settings menu in the meantime. 
All platforms can also have YouTube ad blocking turned on or off from the settings menu. 
And just to state the obvious, remember you'll actually have to be watching the video in the DuckDuckGo browser rather than the YouTube app in order to take advantage of the blocker. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.3%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.1%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.0%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.0%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.4%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Anna Washenko: 1.7%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 6.4%Engadget: 6.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 18.1%Anna Washenko: 1.2%Engadget: 1.0%Loss Aversion18.1%This article: 9.6%Anna Washenko: 0.9%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 5.7%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.1%Anna Washenko: 2.7%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias18.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 9.3%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.0%Engadget: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.1%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.0%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.8%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 3.2%Engadget: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.2%Engadget: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.4%Engadget: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.8%Anna Washenko: 4.3%Engadget: 4.9%Appeal to Authority15.8%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.2%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.7%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 9.4%Engadget: 5.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.1%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.1%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.2%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.3%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.4%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.6%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 18.1%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof18.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.7%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.4%Engadget: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 3.2%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 5.0%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.8%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 11.4%Engadget: 7.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 18.1%Anna Washenko: 1.6%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination18.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.9%Engadget: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

177 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker46%attributed speech95writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDuckDuckGo • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDuckDuckGo • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDuckDuckGo • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

DuckDuckGo

100%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words100% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination-33.7 ptsWriter: 33.7%DuckDuckGo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.