Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Web Browsers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 3,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,323 of 16,562 topics). This Web Browsers is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Web Browsers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,904
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos