Author summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Forristal results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Recency Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,852 hits . Analysis detected 6,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,212 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,780 of 6,359 authors). This Lauren Forristal is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Lauren Forristal
Author details
Total words: 8,212
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 22.6% 22.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 22.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst