Speaker summary
⁠85%3 analyzed articles/videos112.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic National Committee results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 47% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 464.929 faulty-reasoning hits from 112.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,973 of 28,364 speakers). This Democratic National Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Democratic National Committee

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
39.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos112.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 74.5%74.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 47.0%47.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 23.5%23.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 74.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos