Speaker summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos113.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic lawmakers results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Unattributed Quote, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 147.051 faulty-reasoning hits from 113.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (15,336 of 26,730 speakers). This Democratic lawmakers is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
26.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos113.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 31.8%31.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.8%31.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 6.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos