Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos3,726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Lucas results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 3,061 hits. Analysis detected 18,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,572 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,015 of 6,602 authors). This Ryan Lucas is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Ryan Lucas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Ryan Lucas (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,572
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate