Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EconoTimes results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 441 hits . Analysis detected 3,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,592 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 30% (290 of 410 publications). This EconoTimes is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,592
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst