Speaker summary
42% 4 analyzed articles/videos 356.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lammy results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 664.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 356.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,865 of 28,364 speakers). This David Lammy is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. David Lammy
Speaker details
Total words: 356.333
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.8% percentile 8.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos356.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst