Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Kathleen Stock results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 2,320 hits . Analysis detected 16,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,718 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kathleen Stock is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kathleen Stock
Author details
Total words: 11,718
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.8%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst