Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PAN PYLAS results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 616 hits . Analysis detected 3,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,054 of 6,365 authors). This PAN PYLAS is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. PAN PYLAS
Author details
Total words: 4,024
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst