Speaker summary
54% 26 analyzed articles/videos 1,142.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darializa Avila Chevalier results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 174.229 hits . Analysis detected 1,760.44 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,142.667 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,508 of 28,364 speakers). This Darializa Avila Chevalier is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Darializa Avila Chevalier
Speaker details
Total words: 1,142.667
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 5.3% BS Score26 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst