Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Baharaeen results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 5,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,114 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Baharaeen is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Michael Baharaeen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
84%Michael Baharaeen (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.5%20.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 19.9%19.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.0%19.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos