Speaker summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 472.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Negrete results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 226 hits . Analysis detected 945.725 faulty-reasoning hits from 472.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (32,465 of 35,883 speakers). This Daniel Negrete is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Daniel Negrete
Speaker details
Total words: 472.333
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 8.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos472.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.2% 28.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst