Speaker summary
53% 9 analyzed articles/videos 566.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connie Chan results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 144.648 hits . Analysis detected 1,033.658 faulty-reasoning hits from 566.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,463 of 28,364 speakers). This Connie Chan is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Connie Chan
Speaker details
Total words: 566.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score9 analyzed videos566.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Tu Quoque: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst