Author summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Io Yeh Gilman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 4,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,494 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,132 of 6,228 authors). This Io Yeh Gilman is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Io Yeh Gilman
Author details
Total words: 5,494
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst