Speaker summary
⁠36%4 analyzed articles/videos421.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Trickler-McNulty results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Slippery Slope, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 691 faulty-reasoning hits from 421.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,135 of 28,364 speakers). This Claire Trickler-McNulty is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Claire Trickler-McNulty

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos421.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.1%8.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos