Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perla Trevizo results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,148 hits . Analysis detected 7,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (6,126 of 6,628 authors). This Perla Trevizo is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Perla Trevizo
Author details
Total words: 14,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst