Speaker summary
42% 8 analyzed articles/videos 919.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Wonsley results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 281.935 hits . Analysis detected 1,072.786 faulty-reasoning hits from 919.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,029 of 28,364 speakers). This Christine Wonsley is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Christine Wonsley
Speaker details
Total words: 919.667
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score8 analyzed videos919.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst