Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Bailey results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 4,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,085 of 6,359 authors). This Chelsea Bailey is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Chelsea Bailey
Author details
Total words: 5,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst