Speaker summary
44% 5 analyzed articles/videos 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Lutvak results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , False Dilemma , and Tu Quoque , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 58 hits . Analysis detected 469.655 faulty-reasoning hits from 260 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,942 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Lutvak is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Charles Lutvak
Speaker details
Total words: 260
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 10.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos260 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst