Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Curreri results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 201.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,767 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Curreri is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Charles Curreri
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
71.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos