Speaker summary
49%7 analyzed articles/videos254.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 569 faulty-reasoning hits from 254.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,833 of 28,364 speakers). This Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
15.4% BS Score7 analyzed videos254.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate