Speaker summary
⁠32%5 analyzed articles/videos87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Centers for Disease Control results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 97 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,925 of 28,364 speakers). This Centers for Disease Control is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Centers for Disease Control
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
27.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos87 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 26.9%26.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos