Speaker summary
⁠31%5 analyzed articles/videos152.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 242 faulty-reasoning hits from 152.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,218 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos152.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos