Speaker summary
69% 7 analyzed articles/videos 833.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl DeMaio results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 563 hits . Analysis detected 4,509.095 faulty-reasoning hits from 833.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (24,018 of 26,155 speakers). This Carl DeMaio is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Carl DeMaio
Speaker details
Total words: 833.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.2% percentile 8.5% BS Score7 analyzed videos833.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 31.1% 31.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 33.2% 33.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 30.9% 30.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 33.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst