Author summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelina Delfin results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 1,126 hits. Analysis detected 7,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,112 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,184 of 6,361 authors). This Angelina Delfin is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Angelina Delfin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Angelina Delfin (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,112
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 27.4%27.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.9%14.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.1%6.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 27.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos