Speaker summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video87.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candace Hadley results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,606 of 28,315 speakers). This Candace Hadley is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Candace Hadley
Speaker details
Total words: 87.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
12.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos87.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos