Speaker summary
⁠77%5 analyzed articles/videos156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Public Utilities Commission results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 97.735 hits. Analysis detected 217.735 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,707 of 28,364 speakers). This California Public Utilities Commission is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
California Public Utilities Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
27.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.6%62.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos