Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Alejandro Lazo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 2,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,913 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,347 authors). This Alejandro Lazo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Alejandro Lazo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Alejandro Lazo (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,913
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.0%22.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos