New heat rules limit when utilities can cut off your power 64%

By Lynn La25%

7/17/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 915 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,038 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the article peer group.

As heat waves become more intense and last longer due to climate change, setting rules around when utilities can shut off power for people who don’t pay their utility bills is one of the top concerns for consumer advocates and state regulators, reports CalMatters’ Alejandro Lazo. 
On Thursday the California Public Utilities Commission voted to decrease the temperature at which utilities are barred from shutting off power to delinquent customers  from 100 to 90 degrees. 
The move comes after advocates pushed for a wider safety net, partly, out of concern for residents in rural areas, where losing power could also mean losing water and ways to cool down. 
The decision rejects what utilities wanted, which was a higher cutoff threshold involving CalHeatScore  a newly created state tool that scores heat by ZIP code  and keeping the 100-degree default when the index wasn’t available. 
Two California laws also underscore the growing concern of sweltering temperatures on students and educators, write CalMatters’ Alejandra Reyes-Velarde and Ana B. 
Ibarra. 
Gov. 
Gavin Newsom earlier this week signed a law requiring the state’s board of education to consider educating students about heat illness and its symptoms. 
Though the law has no mandates, it “promotes awareness and prevention” and gives students “the knowledge to protect themselves,” said Assemblymember Tom Lackey, a Palmdale Republican and bill author. 
Another law, passed in 2024, requires schools to draft rules for outdoor activities when there are heat waves. 
The law had a key deadline this month, which required schools to have heat-safety plans  such as specifying safe indoor activities as alternatives to outdoor ones  ready by July 1. 
But critics of the legislation say neither requires the state to spend money nor do much to make schools safer, like updating HVAC systems and shade structures. 
Read more about how extreme heat affects utility shutoffs and classrooms. 
**Your favorite state, in photos:** CalMatters has teamed up with CatchLight on “California in Pictures,” a monthly newsletter that highlights compelling photojournalism from across the state. 
See the latest edition here. 
Sign up to receive the next one. 
### Other Stories You Should Know 
## CalMatters marks 11-year anniversary 
**From CalMatters’ Editor in Chief Kristen Go:** 
Tomorrow marks 11 years since CalMatters started publishing. 
Our mission has been unwavering: To help all Californians access clear, trusted information in the moments they need it, when they vote, when they share and when they show up. 
Our reporting helps someone understand what a ballot measure would really do. 
It helps a reader follow what their elected officials promised, how they voted and what happened next. 
It helps a parent, student, worker or neighbor understand how public decisions affect their life. 
Our newsroom is privileged to bring you and everyone in California clear information every election and every day. 
And our journalists work tirelessly to make that happen: Reviewing the California budget line by line, pushing to unlock public records, digging through massive datasets, obsessing over every detail of our voter guide, and translating complicated policy into clear news you can use. 
We can do this thanks to the members who support our nonprofit and independent newsroom with donations. 
Their generous support helps all Californians vote with confidence, ask better questions, follow the facts, share information they trust and hold the powerful accountable. 
And right now, your gift can have double the impact, thanks to a match from a generous CalMatters contributor and board member. 
Please give today. 
## Republicans’ money advantage 
Democrats were successful in gerrymandering the state so that districts lean more blue for the November election. 
But when it comes to campaign cash, Republicans are leading the race, reports CalMatters’ Maya C. 
Miller. 
After redistricting, some congressional districts that were solidly Republican are now considered flippable or must-wins for Democrats in order to win control of the U.S. 
House. 
For the state’s two most competitive districts, a costly June primary puts Democratic candidates at a financial disadvantage compared to their GOP competitors. 
In the Central Valley, for example, Republican Rep. 
David Valadao has more than $3.3 million in cash on hand. 
His Democratic opponent, progressive newcomer Randy Villegas, only has about $571,000 after fending off a Democratic opponent. 
Villegas’ campaign spent more than $1.45 million in the two months leading up to that primary, while Valadao’s camp spent less than $280,000. 
Read more. 
**A state bill intended to reduce construction costs** for affordable housing would also reduce access to electric vehicle charging for those who need affordable transportation the most, writes Michelle Pierce, an electric vehicle advocate and consultant who founded EV Nirvana. 
### Other things worth your time: 
Some stories may require a subscription to read. 
**ICE has detained more than 650 children** in CA under Trump’s deportation crackdown // Edsource (free) 
**Google wiped user reviews** on ICE detention centers // The San Francisco Standard (paywall) 
**One step forward**, two steps back for solitary confinement reforms in CA // Bolts (free) 
**The Army veteran killed outside** his Escondido ‘Trump house’// The New York Times (gift) 
**California Forever loses $3.2B shipyard contract** as defense startup picks TX // San Francisco Chronicle (gift) 
**This tiny oyster once thrived in CA. 
** Now, scientists are bringing it back // KQED (free) 
**9th Circuit upholds** CA switchblade ban // The Mercury News (gift) 
**‘I didn’t cheat’:** CA DMV’s test fraud claims spark frustration, anger // Los Angeles Times (paywall) 
**Katie Porter**, book influencer // SFGate (free) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.4%CalMatters: 2.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Lynn La: 2.7%CalMatters: 2.4%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 2.7%Lynn La: 0.7%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias4.7%This article: 13.7%Lynn La: 6.4%CalMatters: 5.7%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 7.8%Lynn La: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Loss Aversion7.8%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Lynn La: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.9%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.7%CalMatters: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Lynn La: 9.0%CalMatters: 8.0%Negativity Bias19.0%This article: 3.8%Lynn La: 1.9%CalMatters: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 2.5%Lynn La: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.4%Halo Effect15.5%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 2.5%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Lynn La: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem1.9%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.5%Lynn La: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.2%Appeal to Authority7.5%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%Lynn La: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.7%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.9%Lynn La: 6.6%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 2.1%CalMatters: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Lynn La: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.8%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 4.4%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy4.4%This article: 23.3%Lynn La: 2.2%CalMatters: 0.9%Unattributed Quote23.3%This article: 8.3%Lynn La: 1.6%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection8.3%This article: 15.0%Lynn La: 4.2%CalMatters: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice15.0%This article: 5.6%Lynn La: 2.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Indoctrination5.6%This article: 1.9%Lynn La: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Lynn La: 3.7%CalMatters: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.0%

915 words analyzed.

Speakers

14speakers57%attributed speech392writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlejandro Lazo • 46 words • 100.0% coverageCalifornia Public Utilities Commission • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageCalHeatScore • 37 words • 0.0% coverageAlejandra Reyes-Velarde • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAna B. Ibarra • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTom Lackey • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageCalMatters • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Go • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Go • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Go • 30 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 12 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Go • 15 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 18 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 43 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 17 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 24 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 22 words • 100.0% coverageKristen Go • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageMaya C. Miller • 16 words • 100.0% coverageMaya C. Miller • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Valadao • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Villegas • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Pierce • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageKatie Porter • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michelle Pierce

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words7.6% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+84.7 ptsWriter: 15.3%Michelle Pierce: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-19.4 ptsWriter: 19.4%Michelle Pierce: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Michelle Pierce: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Michelle Pierce: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.