Speaker summary
83%11 analyzed articles/videos228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bulwark+ Takes results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Representativeness Heuristic, and In-Group Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 89.9% saturation with 204.935 hits. Analysis detected 301.935 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 33% (18,996 of 28,364 speakers). This Bulwark+ Takes is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Bulwark+ Takes

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
20.6% BS Score11 analyzed videos228 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 89.9%89.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 89.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate