Speaker summary
⁠32%5 analyzed articles/videos230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Schatz results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 38.152 hits. Analysis detected 284.152 faulty-reasoning hits from 230 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,593 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Schatz is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Brian Schatz

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.8% percentile
9.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos230 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos