KUOW73%

Lawyer says WA tourist accused of hurling rock at Hawaiian monk seal has been doxed, threatened 29%

By Associated Press60%

5/27/2026, 9:57:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 651 faulty-reasoning hits from 509 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,743 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the article peer group.

HONOLULU (AP)  The defense attorney for a tourist from Washington state accused of hurling a coconut-sized rock at an endangered Hawaiian monk seal says his client was trying to protect sea turtles and has since been physically assaulted, threatened, and doxed. 
Igor Lytvynchuk, 38, of Covington, Washington, is scheduled to appear in U.S. 
District Court in Honolulu Wednesday on charges of harassing and attempting to harass a protected animal. 
Earlier this month, a witness recorded what prosecutors say was a video of him throwing the rock at a Hawaiian monk seal at a Maui beach. 
He later made arrangements to surrender in the Seattle area as special agents with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were seeking to arrest him, prosecutors said. 
The video drew widespread condemnation and demands for prosecution in Hawaii, including from Maui’s mayor. 
Scientists identified the seal as an adult male known as “R404," NOAA said. 
According to prosecutors, a state Department of Land and Natural Resources officer investigated a report of Hawaiian monk seal harassment in Lahaina, the community that was largely destroyed by a deadly wildfire in 2023. 
A witness showed the officer video of the seal swimming in shallow water while a man watched from shore. 
The video showed Lytvynchuk throwing the rock, described by a witness as the size of a coconut, directly at the seal, narrowly missing its head, prosecutors said in a criminal complaint. 
When a witness confronted Lytvynchuk, he said “he did not care and was ‘rich’ enough to pay any fines,” according to the complaint. 
Afterward, a man “brutally assaulted” Lytvynchuk, his defense attorney Myles Breiner told The Associated Press. 
Lytvynchuk declined to file a police report on the assault, the attorney said. 
Breiner explained his client had been to Hawaii previously and was familiar with sea turtles, but not Hawaiian monk seals. 
Lytvynchuk is a fisherman and thought the seal was an aggressive sea lion, the lawyer said. 
“So his response was not to hurt this monk seal, but to get it away from the turtles,” Breiner said. 
The incident shows NOAA must do more to educate the public about protecting Hawaiian monk seals, Hawaii's U.S. 
Sen. 
Brian Schatz, a Democrat, said in a statement. 
Since the video surfaced, Lytvynchuk has faced death threats and doxing, including receiving a package at his home containing what appeared to be feces, Breiner said. 
He said his client is being treated unfairly because he's a white outsider. 
“The vast majority of attacks on monk seal and turtle are by locals," he said. 
Lytvynchuk is charged with violations of the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. 
Hawaiian monk seals are a critically endangered species. 
Only 1,600 remain in the wild. 
If convicted, he faces up to one year in prison for each charge. 
He also faces a fine of up to $50,000 under the Endangered Species Act and a fine of up to $20,000 under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Associated Press: 2.2%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Associated Press: 3.2%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 3.1%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Associated Press: 7.1%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect14.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Associated Press: 8.7%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias13.8%This article: 17.7%Associated Press: 2.0%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias17.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.0%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.1%Associated Press: 3.4%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 3.9%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 2.7%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization2.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 0.4%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon2.9%This article: 5.1%Associated Press: 4.7%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion5.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 2.2%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Associated Press: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.5%Associated Press: 1.3%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.5%This article: 4.5%Associated Press: 1.1%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 8.3%Associated Press: 3.0%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.7%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

509 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers31%attributed speech350writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageNOAA • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Schatz • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMyles Breiner • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Myles Breiner

100%flagged-word coverage
138 attributed words87% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%Myles Breiner: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Myles Breiner: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Myles Breiner: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Myles Breiner: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.