Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Roberts results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (521 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Brad Roberts
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos