Speaker summary
52% 60 analyzed articles/videos 4,434.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernie Sanders results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 595.157 hits . Analysis detected 5,150.299 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,434.333 analyzed words across 60 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,837 of 25,889 speakers). This Bernie Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Bernie Sanders
Speaker details
Total words: 4,434.333
Article count: 60
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score60 analyzed videos4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst