Speaker summary
⁠48%5 analyzed articles/videos305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Batya Ungar-Sargon results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 98.322 hits. Analysis detected 761.197 faulty-reasoning hits from 305 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,496 of 28,364 speakers). This Batya Ungar-Sargon is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Speaker details
Total words: 305
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.1% percentile
9.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos305 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.4%19.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos