Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video1,684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth R. Wisse results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 1,530 hits. Analysis detected 9,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,335 of 6,359 authors). This Ruth R. Wisse is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Ruth R. Wisse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
79%Ruth R. Wisse (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,052
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 30.3%30.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.3%15.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.1%8.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 30.3%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos