Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australian National University results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (365 of 28,364 speakers). This Australian National University is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Australian National University
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510098.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos20 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos