Speaker summary
72% 5 analyzed articles/videos 482.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio Reynoso results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 185.636 hits . Analysis detected 1,109.537 faulty-reasoning hits from 482.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,498 of 28,364 speakers). This Antonio Reynoso is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Antonio Reynoso
Speaker details
Total words: 482.667
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 7.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos482.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 38.0% 38.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.9% 20.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst