Speaker summary
⁠59%4 analyzed articles/videos385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annie Farmer results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,482.513 faulty-reasoning hits from 385 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (22,066 of 26,404 speakers). This Annie Farmer is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Annie Farmer
Speaker details
Total words: 385
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
12.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos385 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos