Speaker summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anker results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Optimism Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 391.856 faulty-reasoning hits from 143 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,563 of 28,364 speakers). This Anker is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Anker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
23.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos143 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos