9to5Mac58%

iPadOS 27 still needs simpler multitasking 71%

By Michael Burkhardt76%

7/11/2026, 2:05:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 72.6% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 2,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 730 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,439 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the article peer group.

iPadOS 27 still needs simpler multitasking, here’s what I’d like to see 
Michael Burkhardt | Jul 11 2026 - 2:05 pm PT 
Last year, Apple completely reinvented multitasking on the iPad, with the introduction of windowing in iPadOS 26. 
At first, this meant the removal of the simpler version of multitasking, Split View and Slide Over. 
Those features did eventually return , but at a cost  they required you to use the clunky new windowing system. 
I was hoping iPadOS 27 would improve this, but it didn’t. 
To be clear, I don’t actually have a total opposition to the new windowing system in iPadOS 26 (and now 27). 
It has a time and a place, and when I’m trying to bounce between multiple apps at once on my 13-inch iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard , it works exceptionally well. 
I have mixed feelings about it on smaller iPads, but it’s fine. 
What I don’t like, however, is the fact that the only other option (other than Stage Manager, which is more of a feature within windowing than a different option) is to use every single app in full screen  with no sort of flexibility. 
What I’d like to see 
As mentioned earlier, iPadOS 26 did eventually bring back Split View and Slide Over in later betas  but you can only use them if you only have windowing turned on. 
This meant that if you wanted the simpler versions of multitasking, you had to deal with all of the layers of complexity meant for pro users. 
It’s certainly fine, but at times it simply gets annoying that you have to position your windows just right for it to snap into Split View or Slide Over, whereas it was much more seamless prior to iPadOS 26. 
It’s also a loss for people who love windowing, because if you drag your window ever so slightly wrong, it might enter Split View when you don’t want it to. 
Apple does let you long press the traffic lights to get more specific toggles for managing Split View and Slide Over states, but this also doesn’t feel right for just simple iPad usage. 
Split View and Slide Over belong on iPadOS for sure, but shoveling them in within windowing makes it more complicated than it needs to be, even a year later. 
Ideally, there’d be two sets of multitasking options on iPadOS: Classic and Pro. 
Classic would largely open apps in full screen, but have the options for Slide Over and Split View, and Pro would have the windowing that iPadOS 26 introduced. 
Within Pro, there’d also be an option to enable/disable Stage Manager. 
Overall, I just feel like Apple took the iPad too far in one direction for Magic Keyboard /laptop replacement users, and the multitasking experience is a bit lacking for those who just want their iPad to be an iPad. 
Bringing back a “simple” multitasking option would go far in that direction. 
How do you feel about iPad multitasking since iPadOS 26? 
Let us know in the comments. 
My favorite Apple accessory recommendations: 
Anker MagSafe/Qi2 Ultra-Slim Battery Pack 
AirPods Pro 3 (2x ANC vs AirPods Pro 2!) 
Anker Nano 45W Fast Charger with Smart Display 
Anker Nano 13-in-1 MacBook Docking Station 
Logitech MX Master 4 Mouse for Mac 
Belkin Qi2 3-in-1 MagSafe Charging Stand 
Follow Michael: X/Twitter , Bluesky , Instagram 
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: 
Michael is 9to5Mac’s Weekend Editor, keeping up with all of the latest Apple news on Saturday and Sunday. 
He got started in the world of Apple news during the pandemic, and it became a growing hobby. 
He’s also an indie iOS developer in his free time, and has published numerous apps over the years. 
Michael Burkhardt's favorite gear 
Anker 25K Compact Battery Bank 
Featuring two built in cables, a built in display, multiple ports, a 25,000mAh capacity, and up to 100W of output - this is one of the best battery banks for recharging your entire Apple ecosystem on the go. 
AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) 
Despite a new version reportedly being around a corner, I still personally believe AirPods Pro 2 are a great deal. 
They're already equipped with USB-C, and continually gain new software features. 
With them consistently going on sale, it's a great purchase to make. 
Features like Adaptive Audio are incredible. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Michael Burkhardt: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.3%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Michael Burkhardt: 2.5%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 3.8%Michael Burkhardt: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 4.3%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Michael Burkhardt: 6.1%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 10.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion10.0%This article: 9.3%Michael Burkhardt: 1.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias9.3%This article: 4.2%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect4.2%This article: 11.1%Michael Burkhardt: 6.3%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias11.1%This article: 6.8%Michael Burkhardt: 1.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias6.8%This article: 34.4%Michael Burkhardt: 6.0%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias34.4%This article: 1.2%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias1.2%This article: 5.3%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Michael Burkhardt: 1.0%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Michael Burkhardt: 5.2%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect15.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Michael Burkhardt: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Michael Burkhardt: 4.1%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 11.6%Michael Burkhardt: 3.5%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma11.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.6%Michael Burkhardt: 6.5%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization12.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%Michael Burkhardt: 1.8%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.3%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.3%Michael Burkhardt: 3.0%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal22.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Michael Burkhardt: 3.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.5%Michael Burkhardt: 1.3%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote4.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 72.6%Michael Burkhardt: 11.0%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice72.6%This article: 2.5%Michael Burkhardt: 2.4%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Michael Burkhardt: 22.9%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…22.2%

730 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers11%attributed speech652writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Burkhardt • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageAnker • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageAnker • 8 words • 100.0% coverageAnker • 6 words • 100.0% coverageLogitech • 7 words • 100.0% coverageBelkin • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage9to5Mac • 9 words • 100.0% coverage9to5Mac • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burkhardt • 4 words • 100.0% coverageAnker • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

9to5Mac

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words35% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-81.3 ptsWriter: 81.3%9to5Mac: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +16.2 ptsWriter: 17.2%9to5Mac: 33.3%33.3%Unattributed Quote-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%9to5Mac: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.