Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Rayner results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 65.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 472 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,374 of 27,556 speakers). This Angela Rayner is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Angela Rayner
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
41.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 65.7%65.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.3%34.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 65.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos