Speaker summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos67.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Ogles results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 246.218 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Ogles is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Andy Ogles
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 67.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
26.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos67.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 59.0%59.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 59.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos