Speaker summary
47% 9 analyzed articles/videos 338.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Klobuchar results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 112 hits . Analysis detected 555.573 faulty-reasoning hits from 338.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,877 of 28,364 speakers). This Amy Klobuchar is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Amy Klobuchar
Speaker details
Total words: 338.333
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score9 analyzed videos338.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst