Speaker summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos91 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aisha Wallace-Palomares results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 52.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 141 faulty-reasoning hits from 91 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,170 of 28,364 speakers). This Aisha Wallace-Palomares is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Aisha Wallace-Palomares

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
38.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos91 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.8%52.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.1%34.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.1%34.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos