Publication summary
34% 30 analyzed articles/videos 24,766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Nevada Independent results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 4,727 hits . Analysis detected 50,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 106,593 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (478 of 570 publications). This The Nevada Independent is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 106,593
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score30 analyzed articles106.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst