Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Isabella Aldrete results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 1,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,318 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,114 authors). This Isabella Aldrete is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Isabella Aldrete
Author details
Total words: 3,318
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst