Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Schaus results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 1,325 hits. Analysis detected 7,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (1,307 of 9,114 authors). This Michael Schaus is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Michael Schaus
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠86%Michael Schaus (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,432
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.2%9.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 7.6%7.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos