Publication summary
⁠3%4 analyzed articles/videos1,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Just Security results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 805 hits. Analysis detected 4,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,708 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (563 of 564 publications). This Just Security is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Just Security
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Just Security (selected)1%
⁠1%Signal Cleveland1%
⁠1%Montana Free Press1%
⁠1%The Trace1%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%Utah Hockey Club10%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 32,708
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
0.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles32.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.0%0.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos